this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

TechTakes

2435 readers
115 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (35 children)

EDIT:

I'm removing the image (keeping the original text for posterity), but I just completely got had by someone straight up lying.

It's quite embarrasing, I should've been way more skeptical of someone posting an image without sourcing the original paper. Turns out not only is it not a recent paper at all (published June 2025), not only is that table not saying what he claims it's saying, but the authors have since removed that table altogether from revised versions of the paper!

That's what you get from reposting someone who has "The Finance Newsletter" in his fucking username, couldn't have gone well for me.

original post

From https://bsky.app/profile/thefinancenewsletter.com/post/3mek7wsqgkk26

Microsoft released a study showing the 40 jobs most at risk by AI:

Tag the most ridiculous entry, I am curious of your choices.

To me it has to be fucking historians. Arriving at new conclusions by looking at available evidence and/or finding obscure references that are not well known to the public -- CLASSIC THING LLMS ARE GOOD AT.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 1 points 19 hours ago

Switchboard operators?

load more comments (34 replies)