this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8910 readers
137 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

That's basically the story. We had no CEO for over a year, a large org around 400 people or so. People just kept doing their work, and things kept running along.

Amusingly, the most disruptive part was actually the new CEO coming on board, because naturally he had to show that he had his own ideas. So he decided to change a bunch of processes just for the sake of it.