this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026

411 points (92.4% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2766 readers

217 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

anticolonialist@lemmy.world

K1nsey6@lemmy.world

411

But they claim it's Russia interfering in our elections to deflect from the real problem (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by K1nsey6@lemmy.world to c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world

162 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, there's a Wikipedia page with sources and everything: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2024_United_States_elections

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL at Wikipedia

[–] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah Grokpedia is better here, clearly.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOL false dichotomy attempt.
Cheap and embarrassing.
As I said to some other conspiracy theorist on here:
Show me** evidence** from credible sources.
I'm sure this will be the last I hear from you LOL.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, it's 2026 and you don't know how Wikipedia works? Cheap and embarrassing

You just have to scroll down, and then you get to:


References

    Myers, Steven Lee and Barnes, Julian E. (July 10, 2024). "U.S. and Allies Take Aim at Covert Russian Information Campaign". The New York Times.
    De Luce, Dan (February 26, 2024). "Russia's 2024 election interference has already begun". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 1, 2024. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
    Barnes, Julian E. and Sanger, David E. (March 27, 2024). "Russia Amps Up Online Campaign Against Ukraine Before U.S. Elections". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 2, 2024. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
    Barnes, Julian E.; Thrush, Glenn; and Myers, Steven Lee (September 4, 2024). "U.S. Announces Plan to Counter Russian Influence Ahead of 2024 Election". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 4, 2024.
    Roebuck, Jeremy (September 4, 2024). "Feds in Philly announce takedown of Russian-backed propaganda effort aimed at influencing U.S. presidential vote". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
    Lyngaas, Sean (September 17, 2024). "Microsoft says Russian operatives are ramping up attacks on Harris campaign with fake videos". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 17, 2024.
    De Vynck, Gerrit (September 6, 2024). "YouTube takes down right-wing channels linked to DOJ Russia indictments". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
    Zadrozny, Brandy (October 16, 2024). "The disinformation pipeline: How Russian propaganda reaches and influences the U.S." NBC News. Retrieved October 17, 2024. "Russia is the most active foreign threat to the 2024 election, according to U.S. officials."
    Riechmann, Deb (February 13, 2018). "Intelligence chiefs say they're seeing signs of Russian meddling in America's upcoming midterm elections". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on February 14, 2018. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
    Sheth, Sonam (February 13, 2018). "Top intelligence chiefs issue a dire warning about the Kremlin's ongoing efforts to influence the US, defend against Trump's attacks on the FBI, and explain what happened with a shady Russian offering dirt on Trump". Business Insider. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
    Lyngaas, Sean (September 5, 2024). "Russian trolling 2.0: How the Kremlin shifted tactics from its 2016 election strategy". CNN. Archived from the original on September 8, 2024. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
    Myers, Steven Lee and Crowley, Michael (September 13, 2024). "U.S. Accuses Russian TV Network of Conducting Covert Intelligence Acts". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 16, 2024. Retrieved September 17, 2024.
    Bo Lillis, Katie (December 18, 2023). "China, Russia, Iran and Cuba all tried to meddle in 2022 US congressional elections, intelligence assessment finds". CNN. Archived from the original on August 18, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
    "Key Findings and Recommendations: Foreign Interference Related to the 2022 US Federal Elections". Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved November 8, 2024.

There are significantly more of them, too; 85 in all. So many that Lemmy doesn't let me paste them all in one comment. And this is only from the 2024 election. To quote someone insufferable:

I'm sure this will be the last I hear from you LOL.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

NYT, WaPO,etc.....
LOL those are your credible US regime sources?
Man you're a clown.
Also you're switching accounts again, Eglin Airforce Base incompetence

[+] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a US REGIME SOURCE.
Even worse than the regime press mouthpieces.
Obviously far from impartial.
And I'm not wasting my time reading all that.
But even then, If you actually read it I'm sure you can show me EVIDENCE for just one of all these claims I'm prepared to hear it.
As I asked 3 times and you failed to provide it 3 times.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Obviously far from impartial.

Right--it has every interest in making it seem like the government's not being affected by outside interests. They're not impartial--they're biased in the other direction. And they still admit that the Russian government interfered in US elections.

Are you even listening to yourself?

If you actually read it I'm sure you can show me EVIDENCE for just one of all these claims

I provided a whole list of evidence that you discarded because it didn't meet with your purity test. But sure, here's more. The Mueller Report includes documents that:

report a Russian operative calling their work on the 2016 US election "information warfare";
show how Russia actually began operations in the US to destabilize the 2016 election two years earlier;
detail the fake social media accounts that promoted Trump or divided Americans using fake hashtags like "#KidsForTrump";
give evidence for the IRA setting up a 2015 Confederate rally in Houston, as well as a 2016 Trump rally in Miami which Trump himself promoted;
prove that the GRU hacked the DNC and the Clinton campaign, releasing files to WikiLeaks--in one case, only five hours after Trump publicly asked them to do so;
record a Trump associate's email to Michael Cohen: "Buddy, our boy can become president of the USA, and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putin's team to buy in on this."

Plus, outside of the Mueller Report, the Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Paul Manafort cases include, on the record, evidence of Russian collusion.

So I'm not sure what else I can tell you here. It's pretty well-established and clear that Russia has been working to influence US elections for at least a decade now. To pretend otherwise would require some absolutely wild rejection of unbiased facts.

Now, none of this means that Israel isn't also trying to influence US elections. They very clearly are. But more than one country can be doing such a thing.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Right–it has every interest in making it seem like the government’s not being affected by outside interests. They’re not impartial–they’re biased in the other direction. And they still admit that the Russian government interfered in US elections.

Poor thing, doesn't even understand how his banana republic works even if it has been the same scam since the beginning and already mocked by Marx in 1870.

Despite the theater of both of your Uniparty **the main elements are eternal and bipartisan. ** : Imperialism, war,murdering brown people while looting their countries, support for oligarchs, banks and the shitraeli genocide state ARE BIPARTISAN.

In case you also didn't notice, warmongering against Russia has full support of Genocide Joe, Copmala or whatever fascist-lite side may be in charge.
They ALL want to use anything they can invent against Russia.

And clearly you don't even know what evidence or facts is.

It’s** pretty well-established** and clear that Russia has been working to influence US elections for at least a decade now. To pretend otherwise would require some absolutely wild rejection of** unbiased facts.**

Your little AI somation of what a report says is not facts/evidence.
That has as much value as your regime press spouting its usual garbage on the basis of 'it is believed' 'sources say' 'officials have said'.

on the record, evidence of Russian collusion.

And here we go again, SHOW ME THAT 'RECORD' you are referring to, not the CLAIMS.

So I’m not sure what else I can tell you here

Not much since I'm not interested in you telling me stuff if it's not backed up by evidence.
All of you have failed to provide even 1 piece.

I'm sure Russia does a lot of stuff against the US (rightfully) but IU know from experience a lot of stuff in the US/EU press is invented and laughable.

And why would they support 1 candidate over the other when they both are warmongering Russophobes (as mentioned before).
Trump even unilaterally ended the INF treaties, seen as a wild and agressive and dangerous decision.
He fully backed the ukros and still does. Literally at war with Russia by proxy.

Despite all these FACTS (I can back those up) the embarrassing conspiracy level claim that he is a Russian agent is seen as true in your clown country.

Anyway enough about this.
The US is circling the drain with or without foreign influence.
That is the most important and optimistic fact.
Despite their violent lashing out at everything like a cornered cat their time has come.
The world will be a better place when that cancer is finally removed.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

US regime sources

Oh, you're one of those. So when you say "credible source," what you really mean is "source I already agree with." Meaning that, to you, there is no credible source. I guess that means no, there is no proof that will satisfy you. Cool. You've just religioned your way into unfalsifiability, I guess.

you're switching accounts again

Sure, believe what you want to believe. Clearly I have multiple sock puppet accounts on Lemmy to have random arguments with people about whether or not Russia did something to affect the US Presidential Election. I can't honestly comprehend why you think I might be doing that.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

LOL at "you’re one of those."

You're the one making claims and referring to known liars and regime mouthpieces of the US press.
I'm European, I don't rely on your gutter level regime press or their ridiculous claims.

there is no proof that will satisfy you.

Really it's not that difficult, ANY PROOF will satisfy me, as is common in discussions.
"sources say", "it is believed" or whatever cheap tricks your press uses to make baseless claims are NOT PROOF.
I know americans swallow a lot of garbage and 'trust me bro' is enough for them but that doesn't work for me.
I require standards and PROOF. You will fail any time when called out on your BS, as you all did now.
None of you have provided me with any proof.
Embarrassing.