this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
142 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22238 readers
305 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zohran Maoist arc in 2026 challenge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chana@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The OG struggle sessions invoked community justice. They did with the landlords what the community willed, particularly those who had previously been forced to serve them.

What will happen as a result of community vent sessions on "bad landlords"?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What will happen as a result of community vent sessions on "bad landlords"?

you kinda gotta get people together in a room talking about how shitty their landlords are if you want to get them to realize 1) they can do something 2) they should do something 3) they can organize to do that thing

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago

Organizing means actually getting people to do those things. Laying out the framework. And Mamdani is mayor, he has power. Just getting people in a room is weak in that context and could just as easily be a false catharsis session.

See: every single Democrat-led protest or rally.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think the landlords will be dealt with appropriately, but I think when you have the infrastructure to simply imprison them that's much better than having them tortured or killed. It's not really the best application of democratic principles to have what happens to a convicted person be decided by a group of their victims rather than have society broadly agree on standard procedures.

Obviously in Mao's case with the land reform, he did not have such luxuries and relied on the victims of the landlords and other locals not because of some sort of moralizing logic but because managing such an overwhelmingly large project with frequently no infrastructure to facilitate coordination beyond dirt roads is unwieldy unless you just leave it up to the peasants to basically do as they will.

If we imagined that Zohran was a Marxist and had control of the police, the thing to do certainly involves mass arrests of landlords. This action is useful regardless because it's not just about the landlords who get criticized (though them having their reputation publicly destroyed is a plus), but about using these stories as the basis for getting support for policies to prevent many common abuses and broadcasting quite loudly how past administrations allowed them to get away with such things and never bothered to ask people to publicly share their experiences like we see here, and how administrations in other cities are continuing to ignore such problems.

Ziohran Mossadani is bootlicking slime who does apologia for cops, but I think we should regard this campaign as potentially a good thing, though of course it depends on how Zohran and company actually administrates the campaign, since he certainly has shown himself as ready to squander potential for careerist reasons.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago

Y'all gotta get even more cynical, yo. There isn't even a vague agenda outside of this being a venting session. People will be seen and heard. That's the floor and expectation being set and it's already qualified to be about "bad" landlords in a society where people think their landlord is "good" just because they aren't constantly jacking up rent, barging into their living space unannounced, and refusing to make any repairs. In many ways the framing is already a liberal false consciousness.

Perhaps it could lead to good and strategic things. But it could just as easily be garbage and there isn't much to be optimistic about.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we imagined that Zohran was a Marxist and had control of the police, the thing to do certainly involves mass arrests of landlords. This action is useful regardless because it's not just about the landlords who get criticized (though them having their reputation publicly destroyed is a plus), but about using these stories as the basis for getting support for policies to prevent many common abuses and broadcasting quite loudly how past administrations allowed them to get away with such things and never bothered to ask people to publicly share their experiences like we see here, and how administrations in other cities are continuing to ignore such problems.

that "and" is very important. He'd need to do some serious purging to actually have control of the NYPD

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely. There's no way he tries and if he did he'd probably be shot, but without that there's not much he could do for using his office directly for radical change.

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

I bet they go after a family member first.

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the govt it can't just be about finding out who the most bad Ls are because that info is already easily available to them. A vent session can be helpful, but only if the proper follow up is planned.

In my most optimistic imagination they will be forums to strike committees that each have a municipal staffer assigned to them to report back to the mayor. Something like a neighborhood police liaison committee or whatever its called. Probably there would be a bunch of DSA people already planning in each zone. These areas are pretty large so should be broken up into smaller committees according to target L or geography.

If I was living in one of these neighborhoods I'd be inclined to attend for the cruising alone.

[–] Chana@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're overestimating the interest and capacity of NYDSA. Those would be nice things, though.