this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
910 points (93.5% liked)
Political Memes
11005 readers
2330 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Acting like not voting at all would fix anything is a huge part of the problem. Yeah the Democrats not going to do anything, but you know what that means, the Democrats won't do anything. They won't embarass America on the world stage every day, they won't fund the Gestapo to assault minorities and they won't threaten allies with invasion.
Sure the Democrats suck, the whole damn system sucks but it's a whole lot better for a whole lot of people when the Republicans are not in charge.
Yaaay we get decorum and stability at home so we can ignore the Palestinians / Yemenis / Somalis / etc being bombed overseas! Hopefully the bomb will even be dropped by a diverse team under the Dems!
That's a single issue. I agree it's shitty all around. But there are hundreds of issues that are more important. Namely allowing children to be molested, people dying from not having healthcare, and deporting parents and stranding children just to name a few.
It's shitty all around. It's even shittier when it turns into a pissing contest of shittiness.
I'm confused how supporting and engaging in genocide and bombing humans in multiple countries with unique circumstances is both a single issue separate to and less important than doing the same (without bombs) nearer to home.
I guess everyone has a different tolerance for blood on their hands...
Imagine you have a house that is managed by landlords. The landlords have changed ownership and management many times and allowed the plumbing and heating and electricity to become inoperable. Now there are termites.
At some point management put in an HOA and made it so the HOA kicks your neighbors out without any consideration.
We have bigger internal issues. It ain't my blood. All Americans are fully aware we should not be financing anything like that.
The landlords are burning down houses on the other side of town with the renters trapped inside. Then they start doing the same in another neighborhood, then another in the city. When do you start thinking they'll do the same to you regardless of the termites and rot?
Internal issues aren't bigger. They're more personally dangerous. You're simply saying human life near you is more important than human life elsewhere. If absolutely nothing else, paying taxes makes it blood on Americans hands.
Given that the US is engaging in the wars it's clear that not all Americans are fully aware. I mean there are still a ton of conservatives who are pro-Zionism.
That said i know the left is growing and stronger every day. I know there's people trying to fix things. The people I've known who are most effective never considered the border when valuing the state's actions.
constant international war mongering and bombing innocents is a single issue? and not even a major one for you?
jfc death to amerikkka
Oh. So you are just a troll?
Kindly fuck off.
and Russia, and China, and every 1st world country of similar size. Wake up sheeple!
We are living through a time of international tug of war on political influence, resources, and land.
Jesus Christ dude. You are insufferable. Read all the rest of your comments.
I wouldn't advocate for not voting, voting third party would be my advice if you don't want to personally get involved in politics.
Hope that advice only applies to local/state elections, cuz voting 3rd party for president is about as useful as an asshole on your elbow.
The only reason its as ineffective as it is now is because of people like you spend a ridiculous amount of time and effort shaming those who might consider it.
Saying a third party couldn't win is factually incorrect, yet its a common phrase on here isn't it.
Only once has a third party candidate made much progress, and Perot was right-wing/libertarian. You can't skip right to a third party presidential candidate without making progress with that party locally first, then in Congress. That just how this system works. You can pretend that enough people will spontaneously vote for your same third party candidate, but that's a demonstrably a fantasy. You can claim that a vote reflects on your own morality rather than something strategic and practical, but that's a view pushed by people hoping to take advantage of youth vanity and split the vote.
I swear to God. It's like trying to tell a child you can't have ice cream because you're stranded on a desert island and they KEEP INSISTING that they want ice cream.
It's infuriating.
Like, it isn't complicated. You can't start at the beginning of a board game, roll a 6, and move your piece 57 spaces to the end and win. That's impossible.
It's wild how many Americans exist outside reality.
This absolutely can happen, but its not popular in America. Americans just want to vote for their team, at least the majority of them.
And your example is absurd, Trump himself skipped the entire game, and then took over one of the parties.
The only wild thing here is that you lack any creative thought to find a better solution than to vote for democrats and hope the country doesn't fall apart by the time you pass away.
No, they’re right - the Constitution says the person who receives the most votes is President. With the added fuckery of the Slaver’s College, third parties have an unbelievably hard lift to get anywhere close to President.
It’s just not going to happen without a huge base, and there isn’t one. There never is. Just stunt candidates ripping people off for fun & profit.
The only way to get to huge is through small.
Woah. That’s, like . . . true.
I guess we should keep voting for the people who are taking advantage of everyone else then.
As everyone is trying to point out, not voting against them also works.
I mean, does it?
Is the goal to make things worse or so unbearable that society does a 180 and says "Oh man, maybe voting so the literally nazis don't win is a beter idea." or does society just get beaten down and beaten down? How long does real society change take? It took slaves what, oh 200+ years? How's Russia fairing these days?
By not voting you're actively encouraging things to get worse before they get better.
"Not popular" literally means it won't happen, you are restating my point.
You know Trump ran in 2000, right? And that he isn't a third-party candidate?
If you want to hijack the Democrats like Trump hijacked the Republicans, that's a good strategy!
Give me a creative solution that understands the system, and the math involved, and I'm entirely on board. But wishing isn't enough.
And theoretically all humans can live in peace and harmony with one another. Doesn't mean it's happening.
Yeah, but he ran as the candidate for one of the two main parties. That is in no way equivalent to a 3rd party presidential candidate winning. Your comparison is absurd.
My child. The only solution you've indicated is voting 3rd party, which I've clearly explained to you is not a viable option. That isn't an opinion. It's a fact. It's a fact because no 3rd party has any influence. It's a fact because the most popular 3rd party candidate can't even break 1% of the votes.
Why do you choose to live in a fantasy? Is real life just too hard?
Got a better plan?
Factually incorrect but improbable none-the-less.
Sort of, probability isn't a set thing, and everyone analyzes it differently. Part of the reason it seems so improbable is because people keep saying it is.
The reality is though that the majority want either a republican or democrat, because a majority think America is a good country that just needs a little bit better leadership. I disagree with that assessment, and I won't vote D or R again.
It's improbable is because no grassroots movement has been able to fund enough advertisements to run a successful 3rd party run. It's a 2 party system because of money; straight up. Money has to be used to reach votes in hard to reach places across all 50+ states that have varying tax laws. Not impossible, but over the 250+ years of elections (or whatever) it hasn't been done.
It's improbable because voting 3rd party also hopes that other folx agree with the 3rd party and will also vote. Voting 3rd party is throwing away your vote in a system that has been binary thus far. If the choices are voting for a literal Nazi or voting for a Corporate Puppet, and your and your friends vote 3rd party, that historically gives a better chance to either of the other 2 candidates winning, with the Nazi candidate benefiting the most.
There's a lot of people in America; it's a large piechart.
Hmm maybe a general strike would help then. I was going to say we should stop associating and giving our money to greedy capitalists, but thats a general strike so let's so that.
You sound like a child trying to come to grips with reality and failing. It's honestly pretty sad.
Well you really told me.
Oh, you like facts?
Here's one.
In the 2024 election the 3rd party presidential candidate with the most votes only got 0.5% of the total votes cast.
So it is FACTUALLY CORRECT to state a 3rd party can't win the presidency.
Like, what do you not grasp here? No 3rd party has done the work to become nationally viable. No 3rd party even has a SINGLE member in Congress. It is ACTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a 3rd party candidate to win the presidency anytime in the remotely near future. It would take YEARS and YEARS for a 3rd party to become a household name and get members in Congress and actually have a shot at the presidency.
Therefore, voting for a 3rd party candidate for president is akin to wiping your ass with your ballot, smelling it and thinking it smells nice, then flushing it down the toilet.
Well, if we can't even agree what a fact is, what's the point of debating this?
Are you stupid?
Jill Stein got 0.5% of the votes. Proving a 3rd party can't even come close to winning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election#Results
Sure but that's a different argument. I think people call that "moving the goal posts" or something.