this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21226 readers
305 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

Yes and it should have been made the entire focal point of the game. It should have been the game's core identity but they were spineless and made a solos mode. The existence of solos prevents the game from being what it could be if Duos was the only mode available. Everyone plays solos instead and Duos becomes a niche side-story.
Yes but that's fine. The magic that happens when things go right and people synergise to pull off cool shit is VASTLY better than solos optimised combos. The game also has a damage problem, with character dying way too fucking fast, which feels bad, which would not exist if people were dropping combos more due to the synergy required.
I don't think communication is an issue, you don't have time to communicate in duos anyway. All cool shit that happens comes from two people wordlessly weaving stuff together after playing enough rounds with one another to learn the other person's playstyle and patterns.
I'll have to disagree, I still see quite a bit of duos on casual lobby at least, but I haven't played a ton of ranked yet. On tournaments it seems to be a bit of a low representation, but Sonicfox and Inzem are playing duos and getting good results. There's also the twins from Japan that I keep hearing about.
While I agree it is super cool, a best of 3 set is not enough for that to happen to the majority of people, not even a best of 5 would be enough, ranked would be a mess specially on lower ranks. I could see it working for casual, but even then you would require people to keep playing together for a long set, and after that, all that effort goes to waste because you then get paired with someone else that plays differently.
The devs agree with that and are going to tone that down from a video I saw talking about that.
I actually use communication quite a lot with my brother when playing so we don't end up coming in at the wrong time, don't end up wasting super and to use tag correctly. Tagging specially would just be super weird without communication and a common pain point when playing with randoms.
Yes that is the point. It is a good thing for player retention.