I haven't listened to the TrueAnon episode in question but between this, the TrueAnon twitter profile having ace/aro in its profile as an apparent joke, and the "be normal" mantra, the pod gives me definite social conservative vibes.
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
786 readers
578 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That feels like a very unusual and idiosyncratic definition of "normal" to me. Like you say "not being a BlueAnon person" but statistically there are way more BlueAnon people in the US than there are Marxist-Leninists, and they're given much greater legitimacy by at least a section of the mainstream media. It seems to be that by any reasonable definition it's BlueAnon that are the normal ones.
It also means don't be quoting Lenin at the water cooler. Be a person who is not annoying/uncomfortable to be around
I think you get less weird looks for quoting Lenin than for telling people you are vegan tbh.
You are reading way too much into this lol.
It’s just a variation on the meme about touching grass sometimes.
"You assumed 'normal' meant what it almost always means instead of inferring a highly specific and unusual definition of it" = "You're reading too much into this"? What?
I assume that such a vague and useless comment is either an attempt to rile me up or trying to pull the old trick of "winning by acting like you're winning." Not worth engaging with either way.
Hey someone taking the discussion more seriously than you or caring about it more than you isn't a defect. We covered this during our revision of the CoC.
If you don't have anything constructive to contribute other than "people who reply to me are hyper online weirdos" then you should follow your own advice and log off.
If by "the thing" you mean "blocking you and anyone else who says this," you're correct