this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
232 points (90.6% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2759 readers
361 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Stewart would not run, and perhaps for the best. Whoever holds that position will have to be disappointing in some regards due to reality, and Stewart may be better only soeaking to the aspects he excels at without owning the stuff that would tarnish his image and legacy.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

I think it would be hard to talk Stewart into running but only because an election and presidency would be so draining for him.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Not with that attitude. Stewart will run if we need him, and we might.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Stewart would not run,

Stewart might run. They're closer to running than they've ever been before.