this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
60 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39228 readers
588 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some people is saying that Quantum compunting is a hype too. But I am no expert.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Depends what you're ascribing to it.

Will it break encryption? Yes. That's been well understood since the 90's.

Will it help solve certain specific physics problems, including practical ones? Also yes.

Will it do literally anything else? Maybe, maybe not. Honestly, even calling it a "computer" is misleading unless you're an expert. For layman purposes it's more like an electron microscope or ultracentrifuge. Very useful for a very narrow set of tasks.

[–] GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I know about Shor and Grover algorithms and database search. My doubts are about the availability of scalable implementations of Quantum compunting.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Ah. Yeah, that's not a sure thing, but progress has been very, very encouraging lately, and there's no obvious fundamental limit, either. Progress on the error correcting codes has even happened, which was unexpected when the big push to build a QC began.

(FWIW, Grover's search algorithm is more of a toy than anything. You're getting a quadratic speedup on exponentially hard problems, which leaves them still exponentially hard)