this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
560 points (99.3% liked)

Memes

14632 readers
1372 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (7 children)

People always complain about AI slop, but the fact of the matter is, even a shitty AI produces better output than what the majority of people are capable of.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

yeah but I don't hire those people

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

That majority of people that are worse than AI slop are also not producing anything, so we're not flooded with human slop. And when they do, we're supportive because you need to practice producing bad stuff before you can start producing good stuff.

If humans produced slop at the same rate as AI, I guarantee you that everyone will be complaining about it just the same.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

if the majority of people were incapable of meeting the standard of AI, then AI wouldn't have enough data to train on to be better than the majority. it's a lossy database of things that already exist, it cannot create novelty or surpass its training set.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most people can't do that either.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

AI doesn't produce data suitable for training AI. It's a huge problem when AI generated slop makes its way into the training set because it generally degrades the quality of the model. Like a photocopy of a photocopy.

So where is all the data its trained on to surpass most people come from? Do you think they're curating what they feed it based on IQ scores or something? Verifying accuracy, competency, etc? Or are you aware they just turn on the reddit/stackoverflow/github/etc. scrapers and start pumping them full of unfiltered 100% pure grade A internet bullshit?

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 26 minutes ago

I would assume they rank the stuff by vote-count.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's, I'm aware of that. But you don't seem to be aware of the fact that most cultural output (and yes, that includes Reddit shitposts) is produced by a small minority of people. Most people never contribute anything. So however shit the AI slop may be (which I'm not in any way denying), it's still better than what the majority of people can manage. Just look at the percentage of people that are functionally illiterate.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Im sorry dude but if your argument is reddit and stackoverflow are the basis for being "better than what the majority of people can manage" then I just have to respectfully disagree.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Then you obviously live in a bubble.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you're not familiar with the act of producing what the AI is trying to emulate the production of.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, just try to get the average person to write an email that's legible, concise and to the point.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

If you've ever read an AI email, they aren't capable of that either. It's a meme at this point that people use AI to write an email, which becomes far too long, and the reader uses AI to make it shorter. AI does not do concise and to the point.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Any literate person can do that? Despite the public education systems best efforts to train us all in such a manner as to overly pad everything out with an excessive quantity of superfluous filler words, many of which add nothing to the information communicated and may even continue long after the point is made.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

I have terrible news for you; people are not generally literate then.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Any person without training is infinitely better than an AI without training data.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

A person without training data world be a blathering idiot. Any word you've ever heard, anything you've ever seen, smelled or otherwise perceived is data that was used to train the neural network in your head. And that's not counting the billions of years it took to hardwire the hardwired bits.

[–] architectonas@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Your concept of human being is questionable.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

What do you mean? Are you saying stupid people aren't real human beings?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I'm seriously questioning what you consider good, then. That's the reason people call it "slop". It's not good.