this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

Android

21393 readers
114 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But the issue is that the phone and camera would need to be updated together. A large cost to the camera is the sensor and it doesn't need to be updated at the cadence of the rest of the phone.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Crazy idea... keep updating the phone for more than a mere 3 years.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

By the time that phones were good enough not to upgrade every two years, cameras in phones were good enough for most consumers.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Phones been 'good' enough for 15 years. Long before their cameras caught up. They just made new phones harder to fix so your forced to 'upgrade' or disable networks that bricked many.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Having used phones 15 years ago, it wasn't. There may be some cases where a phone could live on longer, but two years was generally a decent cadence to buy a new phone.

Once you get to the 5-10 year mark, cameras on phones were generally good enough for most users.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

The samsung galaxy S was released 15 years ago. Its fully capable to doing everything a modern phone can. Just samsung abandon its software well over a decade ago.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

pull a fair phone and make the sensor easily replaceable/upgradable. so you can get a new phone, without getting another sensor.

definitely in the more proficient and not for everyone.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Phones have become less modular, not more.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know, that trend should be reversed, a1200$ high quality DSLR phone compatible with a major lens standard, with a modular sensor would be a good deal though.

Let me dream man, not like I can afford it anyways

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without the lens, the camera still costs a lot of money and a lot of that is due to the sensor and the image processing which comes from that.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

man, i hope you don't take this seriously, this is just me dreaming about a phone I could never afford.

make the base model just a high end phone with replaceable camera module, with a normal phone camera it'll be about an average phone, with camera app designed for photography. another module with a better sensor and dslr lens dock with full compatibility with a major lens standard. it might cost 600, or another 1000 for a high end one.

I wish we had modularity and innovation instead of endless enshitification

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not taking it as you being hateful against me personally, I'm just being realistic given the market compared to your wants.

Phone manufacturers have come up with ways to handle depth of field which involve more than one camera, which invalidates a phone with an amazing sensor attached to a lens. The market isn't going to provide the device you want.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sorry, I felt like you might be annoyed with me. hard to read tone in just text.

one big advantage is that phone cameras are so good nowadays because they can leverage the relatively powerful processors for imagine processing, even in a live stream. imagine the image quality of a phone due to software processing + from high quality lens/sensor.

maybe more of a professional tool. was disappointed when Red tried making a phone and it was just an expensive phone.

again, I miss innovation,

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 hours ago

Working in an industry that sometimes requires photos to be taken for documentation purposes, cameras that are cameras alone have been abandoned for years. The camera on a phone or tablet is considered good enough, with the most attention recently given to wearable cameras or drones.

Innovation happened, but not within the existing camera form.