this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
34 points (97.2% liked)

Canada

11460 readers
969 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry but I don't think you understood my comment correctly. Unless you're saying that no, we have to accept poor labour practices and rampant environmental degradation - which obviously are things antithetical to the happy, healthy, and alive humans you are claiming to advocate for

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't say anything about poor labour practices, but we do have to accept some environmental degradation.

There is literally no practical way to keep this many people alive without some environmental degradation.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK so I was right that you did miss my point.

What I was saying is that it is not a binary choice between pushing damaging projects here or accepting damaging projects elsewhere, but instead wherever possible we should be doing what we can to mitigate and limit the environmental and social impacts of extraction, insofar as there are things we need to extract.

I see no reason why we can't have high standards.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

What I was saying is that it is not a binary choice between pushing damaging projects here or accepting damaging projects elsewhere, but instead wherever possible we should be doing what we can to mitigate and limit the environmental and social impacts of extraction, insofar as there are things we need to extract.

I mean, yes but there are always tradeoffs and time is a massive factor. If doing everything we can to mitigate local environmental damage means a process that delays the mining of minerals needed for mass-electrification and slows it down, then we'll end up doing more overall environmental damage as we continue to burn fossil fuels.