politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Johnson isn't Catholic though, right? I mean, he could technically do it, but I think it would be shit-stirring. That's pretty anti-papal.
On the other hand, er haven't had a proper holy war involving the Vatican in a long, long time.
Excommunicate him!
Johnson is Southern Baptist. That's like Baptist but with extra racism sciencism and craziness
Imagine a cult. Now, imagine inside that cult another cult. And finally, inside that cult, imagine a group so crazy that the cult's cult said, "maybe you should go start a cult, we won't stop you as long as you leave us alone."
And believe it or not, that double-cult's cult often spawns cults that manage to actually get labeled as cults by governing entities.
Don't miss: The Anti-Pope vs The Anti-Christ! This SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY 💥
Antipope is something else. It's just the lesser claimant to the diocese of Rome
JD Vance is a Catholic convert.
Neither has an excuse to ignore the Bible, but Vance is doubly on the hook for his conversion of choice.
The catholics are crusading while the Nazis are invading!
Idk about Johnson I think he might be protestant, seems evangelical to me, but a lot of these hardcore republicans fundamentalists are catholic.
The American Catholic Hierarchy is very very conservative, even as the Vatican is now progressive. It's an odd dynamic, the Catholics are very much in a struggle between, I don't want to say good, between less bad and more evil.
Johnson is part of the New Apostolic Reformation and is therefor “Baptist”
These people legitimately tried to go to the top of Mount Everest to kill Mary Magdalene, the “queen of ice” to bring Jesus to the Middle East, amongst other things.
Fucking nuts. I bet Johnson doesn't believe either, that he's just cynically going along for his own benefit, and playing the sheep.
Nah I’m pretty sure he’s a true believer. The basically believe with their “seven mountain mandate” that if they control the seven “mountains” (media, government, education, economy, religion, celebration, and family) they can bring about the rapture and the return of Jesus. After the apocalypse and all that.
Oh Jesus Christ that's right I recall reading something about that seven mountains last year. They aren't far off from that either. The return of angry jesus, not that woke new testament jesus, angry jesus promises to drown the world in lake so of blood and fire. That's not hyperbole either that's like verbatim these guys are fucking nuts.
Are baptists evangelicals? I think they are technically different but functionally kind of the same, or can be. They are 25% of the republican base in any case. That is why the president can seemingly do little wrong. They appreciate the degeneration to bring on said rapture and end of the world, which somehow is something they want to happen.
Me personally I oppose drowning the world in blood and fire.
The theology of "burn it all down so God can destroy the bad ones and we good ones can get our reward from God" is childish, selfish and lazy. No wonder it's so popular compared to doing the kind of hard work Jesus did.
That's crazy.
Protestant is a blanket term for the religions that broke away from the Catholic church after Martin Luther did his crazy tour of nailing shit to posts creating the Lutherans, and of course, the Anglicans broke away from the teachings of Cathol because their fat English king wanted divorces. Evangelicals are a whole other bag of crazy, but fall under the Protestant moniker. There are also the Bapists, the Methodists, the Stupidists and the Iamalwaysrightists.
When I was growing up, I went to Catholic school. It wasn't this fucking exclusionary. Hell, we had a gay nun who embraced science so fully and taught us what it meant to truly think for ourselves.
Thankfully, though, Catholic school made me realize that I'm a fucking atheist and the only thing that matters to me are how well people get treated and whether we are getting the basic necessities to live.
Yeah I read a bit about some of them, wish I still had the book The Reformation by William and Ariel Durant. I recall the anabaptists that often would have a little revolution in their town, establish like a communist type state with it's own government and church, they might lock the old leaders in one of those big like bird cage and put them up top over the gates to the city, pretty crazy stuff. The authorities obviously would come through and re-establish "order" after a bit. That was in the 16th century or so.
But it got bloody in the 30 years war in the late 1600s, drawing in almost all the powers of europe at one point or another. All for religion. Central Europe was particularly devastated.
Wait what? I thought the majority of them are evangelicals? Catholics are now around 20%. With almost 50% being protestant and evangelicals.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religious-landscape-study/party-affiliation/rep-lean-rep/
The majority of the crazy shit that's happening now is from the evangelical side, Catholics weren't much better but they at least didn't seem to go full on nazi like.
https://www.statista.com/chart/23992/religion-of-us-presidents/?srsltid=AfmBOoqToaF7ZU4L9kDdsIU-We6buzHGI155qlTsnTJP1MQolLgYzi6Q
Biden was the 2nd Catholic to hold office, the other was Kennedy...both Democrats.
Idk I had previously read 25% of primary voters were said to be evangelical, 35 is even worse. The president had about 30% of the electorate in thrall in 2016 that pulled him through the primary. It is high in any case. They have a lot of kids and they rarely defect and seemingly nothing could turn them towards the common good given their rapture bullshit.
I believe every speaker of the house from 2007 to 2022 was catholic. 6 of the scotus judges. They have their own schools, so they have a large number of people groomed to follow the leader to choose from, places like the federalist society further refine them from law school. Now turning point is getting in on the action more generally grooming, and policing, all schools they get in as a hitler youth type organization, for every student and teacher but that's another story. A story in which Kirk rejected that vision for his own, and the board p(r)icks of the that faction.
Being appointed judge, or chosen for rep, senate, is a lot about being a known quantity. They donors and party leaders generally want someone that is not going to come down with a case of morals. No do gooderism. They are deathly afraid of their appointees for the bench coming down with chronic Patriotism, the entire reason the federalist society was made was because traditionally it didn't matter the party that nominated the judge, after they got in there they sided with the country's interest as they saw fit, to the chagrin of the Republicans. Republican nominees I think ended up being the most progressive justices throughout the 70's and before.
So they are more than token representation, and dominate a lot of posts for whatever reasons, their large pool of groomed partisans probably being one such reason.
Interesting, I'm surprised they have such a large pool, the majority of Catholics I know vote blue.