this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
265 points (99.3% liked)
World News
40400 readers
412 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Was this written by an AI or by an illiterate? That's not what the rest of the article says happened. The Chinese fund didn't refuse to exercise the option, they refused to honour an option that they'd already signed. The opening sentence makes it look like Kibbutz Hanita are pulling a fast one, when it's the exact opposite.
It's an option, not a requirement.
That's my whole point, it wasn't Ballet Vision's option to exercise, it was Kibbutz Hanita's, but the opening summary erroneously describes it as the exact opposite. Here's from later on in the article:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/putoption.asp
(edit: I had a little search just now to see whether it was true that China have made it illegal to invest in Israeli companies. Half the results were literally reporting on this story, and the other half of results were about Chinese companies actively aiding illegal Israeli settlements, which makes me suspect that BV's claim that their hands are tied is bullshit.)