this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

news

24577 readers
485 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well they shouldn't blatantly lie to stop disabled people from receiving help if they don't want to be despised. The lies they told on my form contributed to my benefits being stopped, hence the dire straits I'm in now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DisabledAceSocialist@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't surprise me, since becoming disabled I've learnt just how utterly despised we are, people genuinely believe we're just lazily living off other peoples' money while having a great time, and they resent having to get up and go to work each day to pay for us.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] DisabledAceSocialist@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

yes, but I don't understand what the end goal is. If they just want rid of us, they could legalise assisted suicide. For some reason they're trying to turn everyone against us, keep us alive and starve us at the same time.

[–] Bolshechick@hexbear.net 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

They want us visibly suffering, as a reminder to others to "work hard" or whatever.

That is probably it.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 12 points 23 hours ago

This is it right here. Same goes for how the unfocused are treated.

[–] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

My so-so understanding it is Capitalism is, literally, mathematically, exploitation. Exploitation of humans comes through the malicious exaggeration of all natural differences in things so as to divide and conquer. Within the captive population, it doesn't really want to exterminate (that's for the uncontrolled outsider), because it's happy with the mechanism of division that it understands, and it fears novelty.

It needs "wretches", the labour of their suffering is a threat to other workers, who it tries to make complicit through endless propaganda. Turning the people against themselves makes them into their own oppressors and undermines their ability to understand themselves as a class.

Since those with disabilities are more complicated to exploit, they're less profitable. And since care for others is so innate to humanity (and I would say basic to Life), turning the people against those in greater need is an even greater distortion - "from each according to their needs, to each according to their ability".

[–] SnakeEyes@hexbear.net 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Alienation, it's always the benefits claimants, the Looney left, the black youth, the lazy zoomers, the gender ideology, the Pakistanis, the economic migrants

It's never the fault of the billionaire

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 5 points 22 hours ago

I feel like I need a T-shirt with this printed on it. Then again, maybe I don't want people looking at me that much.

Could we guerilla a billboard or something?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just because they're monsters doesn't mean they want to look like monsters. Their plan may be thwarted by public unrest. Moreover, I guess plenty of interviewers go into the job with starry-eyed dreams of actually helping people, then run into rules and policy; but know if they quit, they are closer to experiencing some of the same problems you do.

[–] DisabledAceSocialist@hexbear.net 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Considering how the assessors go out of their way to deny people, I can't imagine how they'd start wanting to help people. For instance when explaining my vision loss to an assessor and how it makes it difficult for me to do things like cross the road safely, she said that I could just walk around constantly rotating my head in a circle to get a full range of vision, so the vision loss is no excuse for needing extra help. She also wrote on my form that I can see perfectly with glasses. After I had clearly explained to her that glasses do not restore missing vision. They are all just evil liars and frauds.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 hours ago

"Go in" I meant as fresh hires.