this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
125 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

84597 readers
3861 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You probably should've because yeah, the way AI companies are treating creative works is disgusting and downright wrong, but copyright law has very much been broken ever since the Internet became a thing. It's just silly to treat works published on the internet the same way you treat books, paintings and DVDs, not to talk about the issue of jurisdiction on an entity that transcends borders . Aside from that, the laws have been "evolving" to the advantage of big "IP holders" and against the public for a century. A copyright being valid for 70/120 years after the death of the author makes no fucking sense. It should be public domain the day after.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why tie it to death, why not a plain and simple 5 years?

[–] Tweet@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If it was the day after they died, mightn't that have an unintended consequence of making it more likely that copyright holders would start "falling out of windows" just when it's convenient for producers and AI crooks to snaffle up their content, royalty-free?

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

... murder is also illegal?

In any case, I also believe copyright shouldn't be transferable, especially to companies.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Not for certain people.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't that how inheritance works? Everything including the long copyright get inherited immediately.

[–] Tweet@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Well yeah, it is currently. But not if the work becomes PD when you die, as OP is suggesting.