this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)

World News

53271 readers
2153 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it a problem that Musk, the world’s richest man, uses his personal social-media megaphone to promote racist conspiracy theories and boost far-right insurrection across Europe? Is it relevant, when Palantir is awarded contracts to develop IT systems for the NHS and MoD, that the company has built apps for ICE, Trump’s anti-immigration militia; that it feeds them federal data to locate potential targets? Does it matter how much leverage an elected prime minister has if those tech behemoths take against him? Those are not questions of free speech but sovereignty, which is something Conservatives used to care about.

The current debate around social-media bans for under-16s barely skims the surface of these issues. More optimistically, it indicates growing awareness that the mass migration of human activity online is an epoch-defining political event and the default settings on the tools and platforms involved may not be designed with citizens’ best interests in mind. The implications for democracy cannot be reduced to a facile equation of regulation with censorship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Luniio@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I completely agree with the content of this article.

However, this is an opinion piece, not news.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

In the early 2000s there was a lot of talk about social media being used to lie/spread false propaganda and then a Republican got elected and they stopped talking about it

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

Fair, my bad, it just feels extremely prescient given the current moral panic about social media and young people.