this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
252 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

80479 readers
3504 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 27 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

The only market for 8k is movie theaters and megatrons. It’s absolutely not necessary to have it in your tv in your house. And it’s also insanely expensive to get the proper hardware to drive it at full resolution.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Even there it's wasted. There is just no place between pixel density, size and distance for anythng much over 4k. Except maybe video walls, where you don't see the whole image at once.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That’s what I meant re: megatrons (the giant video replay screens they have in a lot of big sports arenas)

[–] diablexical@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

Viewers are so far from those that 8k is not helpful. Also the cameras in the arena would not be able to make 8k video.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 21 hours ago

And it’s also insanely expensive to get the proper hardware to drive it at full resolution.

The shame being 8K (as 2x4K or even more) is awesome for VR headsets, but the only things capable of really driving them are stupidly expensive (thanks NVIDIA) or dual card setups (thanks Mobo producers for making that bad, and CPU manufacturers who insist consumers only need 20-24 PCIe lanes to artificially segment the market, sigh).

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Most cinemas are 2k as well I think

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Even your 4k Netflix is mastered in 2k and uprezed. Often shot in 6k to allow for zooming in in the edit

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

These days 12k at 14-16 bit is the norm.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

IMAX has a laser thing that renders in 4K, but the point still stands. 1080p is good enough for me, and cinema once a year to have fun with friends.

The automatic HDR on my TV was a revolution because it changed the picture. 4K changes nothing.

It's not like we went from black-and-white to color TV, it's like "here are way more pixels but most people don't care because they talk and drink during the movie." Movie nerds may care and it's fine, but I can't justify buying a new TV for that.