datahoarder
Who are we?
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.
-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread
view the rest of the comments
Did the hoarders miss anything while they were up?
Probably: https://github.com/yung-megafone/Epstein-Files
Not sure about the hashes/ sha256's
Data integrity matters here.
Set 10 on archive isn’t complete?
Set 9 doesn't appear to be complete either.
That is because unredacted csam were found and reported on those 2 datasets. I hope csam gets redacted and the pedos names fully unredacted so we can continue our efforts to save the data and hold the pedos accountable.
It feels like they're trying to cover it all up even after releasing at the same time under and somehow overly redacted files
Doge strikes again