this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
133 points (95.2% liked)

Memes

4842 readers
71 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlayGuevara@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And if inevitably the projects reach outside of the commune line into another commune line, how would the intercommunal council be called lol. At what point do you just have a state without calling it a state?

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You can call a federation of communes a "state" if you want. Anarchists are not against this kind of "state". As long as power flows bottom-up by delegation and recall.

[–] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds a lot like democratic centralism.

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The "delegation and recall" part of it? Totally! The "vanguard party" and "DotP" parts? Not so much.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A Vanguard Party is just the most dedicated and ideologically advanced people working together. It doesn't have to call itself a party at all.

DotP is the state machine being in the hands of the proletarian class. If one accepts the concept of classes, that should be a nonissue.

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just answering a poster saying anarchism is a lot like democratic centralism. Some parts are similar (delegation and recall), others are not at all (vanguard party, dotp)

[–] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 months ago

What do you get in the absence of a DotP?

[–] nocturnedragonite@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol then I'll ask the age old question of how do you expect to protect your revolution with no vanguard or DoTP? How do you stop the systemic issue of racism without an actual system to suppress it? That was the chief reason as to why I thought anarchism was silly.

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how do you expect to protect your revolution with no vanguard or DoTP?

This is literally what I wrote in my first comment:

My disagreement with anarchism is different: I think only a state with a strong coercive apparatus can survive sustained imperial pressure and capitalist encirclement.

[–] nocturnedragonite@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not just be an ML at that point, you're already like 75% there lmao

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I am an ML.

I never said I'm an anarchist I'm just explaining what anarchism is and it's not what a lot of people here think it is.

[–] Malkhodr@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think they were asking why, if anarchists are already 75% of thecway there, don't just become MLs.

[–] ldnsbestgay@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

as an ex-anarchist who is now an ML, I read more lmao

[–] nocturnedragonite@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

That's fair 👍🏿

[–] 6kb_@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

sorry i'm not good at telling tone and maybe i'm just not smart and not proficient at theory but is this not like the soviet system

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Early Soviets maybe, before war communism, for like less than a year... There was a reason anarchists tried to assassinate Lenin as a counterrevolutionary.

[–] 6kb_@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

mmm yeah thats true but either way the idea of from the bottom going to top governance is something characteristic of most AES innit? genuine question

[–] Red_Scare@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 months ago