this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
352 points (98.6% liked)
Political Videos
388 readers
54 users here now
For sharing interesting / important political videos from around the Web! Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- Non-political videos should go to !videos@lemmy.world
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Eh, the age limit should be the same as the general age of pension, and it should only apply for being able to be voted in.
This means that if you get voted in at 65, than you are able to serve that term, but nothing longer.
And what of appointed officials, like Supreme Court justices?
I think SC justices should have terms. Make em long terms if you'd like but still limits. And again, no one over 65.
I just had a look at the equivalent of the US suppreme court here, "Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen", and the officers of the court serve until retirement.
Seems resonable to me.
It is the same here. But they often decide to "retire" at death, i.e., lifelong tenure.
Yeah, forced retirement at the national retirement age?
Oh my bad, I misread earlier. Yeah, it should be forced, but here it is not.