this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
544 points (99.8% liked)

politics

27775 readers
2297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Intensive care nurses immediately doubted the word of federal immigration officers when they arrived at a Minneapolis hospital with a Mexican immigrant who had broken bones in his face and skull.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents initially claimed Alberto Castañeda Mondragón had tried to flee while handcuffed and “purposefully ran headfirst into a brick wall,” according to court documents filed by a lawyer seeking his release.

But staff members at Hennepin County Medical Center determined that could not possibly account for the fractures and bleeding throughout the 31-year-old’s brain, said three nurses familiar with the case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Her wife" was included in news reports within about an hour. Didn't seem like any sort of delay to me.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Exactly. It never came out because it was never not out. She was right there on video in all of them.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fair enough. I guess I mostly saw breaking reports which were fairly scant on details followed by opinion pieces which focused more on the "usa slides further into fascism" angle.

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I recall the first reports talking about her dead husband and acting like her kid was an orphan.

I recall the tone changing in how people talked about her in various threads and articles depending on how prevalent her being gay was.

Maybe we saw those reports within an hour, but I recall people still responding to the straight-washed articles the next day.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I noticed no change like this at all. We've had nationwide protests for Renee Good.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not going to say her sexuality hasn't changed the responses by some, it absolutely has. But its not like it was somehow held back.

That said, there are people saying things like "Pretti shouldn't have reached for his gun" - a statement that is absolutely insane considering he not only never reached for his gun, but was also disarmed when he was murdered.

Thats an issue with ignorance, not with reporting. The information is readily available, some just grab that first headline and never bother to learn more.