this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
645 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

10615 readers
2291 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

nothing is stopping people from building enough housing save the desire to keep prices artificially high

I don't know where you're located. I live in a big European city. The space here is limited. The new housing is mostly being built outside of the city really, and it will take years for it to get the proper treatment (like buses, trams, metro line). The immigrants are directly competing with me for the in-city apartments. This could be different if you're located in, IDK, Iceland, where the space is not really a problem, or in USA where you don't have public services.

our shit wouldn’t be as cheap

Our cheap shit is imported from cheap countries though?

Given more demand yet they could have built more but little enough to again maximize gain

In 10 to 20 years. But the problem of competing for limited resources is now. Seeing a problem here?

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The space here is limited... The immigrants are directly competing with me for the in-city apartments.

More desirable locations will be too expensive for many, or most, people to afford. As local economies change, and different locations become desirable, people will be priced out and forced to move. Good city planning decisions can slow this down to allow people to adapt, but trying to freeze things in place is futile.

It's not really possible to set up city planning regulations so the population stays exactly the same. If a city were successful in making itself an undesirable place to live so that no one new would move there, it would probably start losing it's population, which (like growth) forces its own hard planning decisions.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Thank you captain obvious. What's your point in the discussion, as you havent made one in that comment.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Seeing a problem here?

Not really. This is not a new problem. This is not a surprise. This is the result of putting off change until it becomes a more serious issue.

Given the nature of politics, of people, problems will always be ignored until they become critical