this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
858 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

79675 readers
3608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
858
Mamdani to kill the NYC AI chatbot caught telling businesses to break the law— New York mayor says terminating the ‘unusable’ bot will help close a budget gap (themarkup.org)
submitted 18 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It was costing the administration around half a million dollars.

How? Surely this was put in place as a cost cutting measure. I mean, terminate it, sure. Pay actual humans. I just have questions.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 34 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Often the promised cost savings never materialise, because when the chatbot fucks up, it's humans who need to clean up the mess.

[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

it's short sighted, because an ai chat bot that can answer basic surface level questions 24/7 should absolutely be more cost effective than having staff field the same questions. You can have half of them be the escalation point and assign different work to the other half. For the population of NYC this is the right approach.

However I would accept that the previous administration was corrupt and overpaid an incompetent contractor. Mamdani should restart the project, not scrap it.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

The only way a chatbot can accurately answer basic level questioning is if staff has put in time to do the documentation. If they have, you frequently don't even need the chatbot because simple web searches will show up the question and answer or one of the major chatbots will have already indexed the documentation and can answer the question for free.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago

it was eric adams.