this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
56 points (90.0% liked)

Linux

61815 readers
406 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been using Debian (and formerly Ubuntu) for many years.

But I've been wanting to tell people that I use Arch.

I've been considering the following distros:

  • Arch
  • Cachy
  • Manjaro
  • Any others?

I'm leaning towards Arch or Cachy. This is for a mediocre laptop that I'm planning to use as a media center: Kodi, Retroarch, Steam, etc. Should I even be using Arch for this? Maybe Debian is more stable...

Sorry if this has been asked before. Thanks for any tips!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

can someone who runs arch btw on weak hardware, like dual-core U-series i5 and such, tell me how they're handling AUR and friends? every time I bring that up I get downvotes as if I'm some MICROS~1 agent paid to besmirch arch btw's good name and whatnot...

the idea that I hafta build and compile shit on a puny dual-core in 2026 is fucking ludicrous to me, never mind the bloat and cruft from all the build tools and deps for every possible stack. so what obvious solution am I missing? like, how do you handle a full system upgrade, say you got like ten things from AUR in addition to regular packages, what does that look like?

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Back in 2015, I was using Arch on a single core Intel Atom 1.5GHz processor with 1GiB of RAM

Most packages came from binary packages, and the AUR was the exception when I needed something specific outside of the main repos

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One suggestion is to look for -bin versions of the packages you want. Those are precompiled and should install only marginally slower than a regular pacman package.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

first time I heard of this, thanks. so running it thusly it's no different than a copr or apt repo?

[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not quite as that its user-created and submitted.

But yeah lots of packages have a -bin counterpart that will install a lot quicker than compiling it for yourself.

[–] Jaaaardvark@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can use an AUR mirror repo to avoid compiling. Chaotic looks like the most popular one.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

thanks, this looks good, gonna try it out with my next build