this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
441 points (96.6% liked)

News

36534 readers
2322 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the recording, the mother of two can be heard discussing with her staff the success of a TPUSA event and the strong sales of associated merchandise. She then appeared to dismiss her husband's death during the discussion while emphasizing harmony between staff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You sound kinda sexist, to frame women in a certain way and trying to blame them as worst than men.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you really think about what I wrote, you'd see the mirror image is actually what I was pointing out. It seems kind of sexist to assume honorable intentions because she is a woman and mother.

I noticed you immediately implied I was mysoganist, though. There was not benefit of the doubt there, was there?

You also flat out accused me of stating women were worse than men, when all I called out was the framing that women are better than men.

I suppose this is where I should label you a mysandrist, but I know nothing about you and I would be attacking your character for disagreeing with me, wouldn't I? I call out that hypocrisy in others so it would be rich of me to practice it, wouldn't it?

My comment was a response to the implicit bias that since she is a woman, there must be some other reason than any unaltruistic impulses. Like, for example, a man who is no longer here to defend himself is the cause of the behavior due to abuse. See? It's his fault.

Would the same statement be applied to a man? Based on what I've seen, he'd have received no such "benefit of the doubt", and fatherhood would not enter the discussion because "men aren't nurturing" (which is bullshit).