this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
790 points (99.1% liked)
AssholeDesign
11255 readers
1 users here now
This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
WTF. And this is profitable?
Good news, looks like it's not: https://www.mobilityenergy.com/en/industry/2025/09/24/roermond-court-pronounces-bankruptcy-of-smarter-nozzle/
Lmao, lmfao even.
Standard at most American gas stations now, but screen is on pump base and super loud. What do you mean profitable? Are you questioning whether ads generate revenue??
Well, advertising is more or less a zero-sum game. Showing more ads to someone does not mean they have more money to spare.
So, there's only so many slices you can cut the advertising cake into. And this concept just feels like someone is spending far too much money for far too small of a slice, for them to be able to make that money back.
Well, and the nozzle company did go bankrupt as someone else commented, so I guess, that answers that question either way...
Screens are cheap man. Advertising is highly profitable and effective. You aren't inonnated with a zero-sum game. It's far from saturation. If it's somewhere your eyeballs point there is profit to be made by putting ads there.
No, just more revenue than the increased vandalism
Putting a screen on the nozzle is more expensive than reusing the pump screen which was already there, and it's bound to break more often.