Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
I'm thinking Engels. Responsible, reliable, motivated, has money, knows how to manage it and is incredibly generous (he died with more than he gained from the factory sale despite supporting the whole German/communist underground in London).
Also who'd be worst? Would Marx ever catch up with his chores? Would Che disappear suddenly for months at a time?
(Not a very serious question obviously)
i'm not sure any of these men would know how to wash their own dishes to be honest. therefore, by process of elimination, rosa luxembourg is probably the only option.
I would imagine the guerillas were pretty good at maintaining hygiene, since that was the number 1 killer in most wars until quite recently. So Uncle Ho, Stalin, Fidel, Che, Tito, Kim and so on would be fine on that front
If Rosa would be my roommate, I'd happily do the dishes and the clothing to give her more room for writing and agitation. She clearly was far, far better at it than me. Would be an honor to support her taking over household chores. We shouldn't infantilise men to the point of lowering the bar to who would even be able to do basic social labor.
well sure, i think they could learn, and obviously rosa's political work was no less valuable than theirs. but the question was, which theorist would make the best roommate. and the differences in practical knowledge reproduction in europe between men and women at the time would have certainly rendered an amount of immediate (but correctable) helplessness from men that were used to all domestic labor falling under "women's work."
Fair enough