this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
802 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

9199 readers
788 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

As a 60 year old man that dates women in their mid-30s (I want children), I feel this post-it note.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Respect for saying this out loud.

But also just a bit yikes, but credit for not going younger than 30s

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Ehhh...it breaks the half-plus-7 rule (I'd call 37 'late 30s')...but it beats 20s. I'm only forty and I can barely relate to my 20-something BILs. I couldn't imagine dating someone in their 20s, and not just because I'm happily married. The culture gap is so real. I could relate to X so much more than Z.

Still...even mid-30s doesn't give much time to plant the seed before you have to worry about the first frost. You gotta sow while the soil is warm. Having your own kid is great and all but maybe look for a divorcee/widow with a toddler...

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Also seems kinda cruel having a kid knowing you'll statistically die before they even graduate high school.

If he met someone today and had a kid by 61 by the time that kid graduates high school he'd be 79.

[–] GingerGoodness@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

My dad was 52 when I was born. Getting real tired of developing chronic conditions that are associated with advanced paternal age, ngl.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Statistically his mean life expectancy is ~20 years left. Keep in mind as you get older your life expectancy goes up since you've already survived what killed many others younger

He'd be expected to die shortly after sending his kid off to college

Source: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fair point, gonna be a rough sophomore year of college then

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Aging lies at the intersection of genetics and environment, which implies that 1) not everyone ages at the same rate, and 2) by optimizing the environment your body operates in (e.g., optimizing sleep, exercise, nutrition, supplements, and drugs ), you can optimize regeneration/repair and effectively slow the rate of aging. I'm lucky enough to have really good genetics for aging and I take exceptional care of myself, optimizing the above parameters, including the use of rapamycin. I have a long line of ancestors that have lived well into their 90s, even back in the 1700s, so I think there is a good chance my corpse will hold out long enough to see my offspring into adulthood.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Same, I'm just getting to forty and the older I get the less dating someone half my age makes any kind of sense. I have patients that I have seen from their teens and they're now in their mid twenties. Thinking about them as anything other than kids just seems unnatural and morally decrepit.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I honestly think dating someone half your age is much better at 40 than 20. Much much better

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Props for the honesty

Wanting children in your 60s is selfish. Not only do you put them at much higher risk for birth defects, but you likely won't be around for most of their life

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Things you can say on the internet but probably not to their face.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

true but it is also true that the older the man the more likely it is he produces children with birth defects or genetic conditions

this has been historically blamed on women and it is now coming to light that old sperm isn't good

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

If you want kids at that age, the solution is simple: adopt. Adopting is just a good idea in general, though. There are already too many people. There's no good reason to make more.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

60/2 + 7 = 37. Mid 30s is cutting it

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Meh, once someone is over thirty they've typically done enough adulting that the "half your age plus 7" metric isn't really necessary. There isn't a power or maturity imbalance, and I'm inclined to think that such women are capable of evaluating the pros and cons of dating me. My current best prospect is a M.D. that is 35.