this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

772 readers
528 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OttoboyEmpire@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

epidemiologist

really makes you think!

[–] GladimirLenin@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it definitely made me think wtf an epidemiologist had to do with the subject matter.

[–] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Gun deaths can (and should) be treated as a public health matter. This particular epidemiologist seems to have a bad take, but that's definitely a productive way to frame the discussion in general. Of course, the rising tide of fascism also impacts public health.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Thinking of violence of a disease. I get why they are thinking this. Violence will spread if the vector (guns, I guess) increase.

The issue is the implicit belief that escalation is a disease that should be avoided. If you flip the script and instead invoke herd immunity or the proliferation of anti-bodies to prevent further harm you get a very different take.