this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
165 points (100.0% liked)
History Memes
1493 readers
899 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
-
History referenced must be 20+ years old.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How can the Wikipedia article not have a translation and yet make multiple references to the fact that translations exist.
Copied from a Website that copied from an out-of-print book that copied it from a FOUR THOUSAND YEAR OLD TABLET copyright is so stupid.
The tablet was translated by Assyriologist A. Leo Oppenheim in his out-of-print 1967 book, Letters From Mesopotamia: Official, Business, and Private Letters on Clay Tablets from Two Millennia, and reads as follows:
I was curious so went to the backrooms hellhole that is the Talk tab and they said it's trusted English source for the translation has it copyrighted. And even if you pull the literal symbols off of the images in the article and put them together, they can't use the transcription/translation because they need it to come from a published expert on the matter.
Surely there must be an academic source that's freely available? Hasn't this thing been known for a long time?
Hence why I called it the backrooms hell hole, where decent ideas or arguments go to die.