412
White House backtracks initial claims about Alex Pretti after intense backlash
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
412 points (100.0% liked)
politics
27968 readers
2396 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Mother fuckers we ALL saw the videos. Pretti's handgun was removed from him and carried across the street by an ICE agent, a full 10 seconds before the first shot was fired. Shit the fuck up with your lies. He did NOT have his gun on him at the time he was shot, there is NO way his weapon accidentally discharged and therefore caused the agents to react by shooting him
FUCK you leavitt
I mean I'm with you but don't say a full 10 seconds. That's easily contradicted by the video. You're right on all the other points, but exaggerating the time like that really harms the point you are making.
I would say it was more like 3 seconds than 10, but that doesn't change what you said.
Also stabilized video from the person who run behind and recorded it (so glad he did it, I think they purposefully blocked view from the street but didn't expect someone record from the back) shows that the murderer was facing directly where the gun was so there's no way he didn't see it being removed.
I was explaining this to my partner last night. It doesn't matter it's a blatant lie, what's important is the average dolt believes the lie.
"Oh, a domestic terrorist with a gun? I'm glad they dealt with him".
"Oh, she tried to run an ICE agent over? I'm glad they dealt with her."
Remember the 'big lie': if a lie is large enough and repeated frequently, the masses will eventually believe it.
I'm fairly sure the reason this latest incident is blowing up in their faces is not the blatant lies, it's that they tried to spin it so that Pretti deserved to die because he was carrying a gun. Which pisses off the 2A crowd. If they had shot an unarmed protester that wouldn't be a problem: he didn't comply, was impeding law enforcement, FAFO, etc., apply thought terminating phrase of choice. But because the conversation has become whether you should be executed for carrying a gun, that's touched a nerve.
Sure, I absolutely agree with you.
In my previous comment I was trying to highlight a slightly different topic: the fact that "the official story" and what has happened are often mutually exclusive and that it's not important the official story is correct but that it's believed.
Maybe I didn't frame it right but I'm talking about the same thing. They lied, egregiously, obviously, repeatedly. The issue now isn't that the story was a lie, and that their supporters are outraged at having been lied to. No, the issue is that it was a poorly chosen lie and not what they wanted to hear.
I guess selling the big lie was always an effective strategy, only now it's being taken to extremes. The fascists don't care about objective reality. They get their reality from the leader and the in-group, and as long as it gives them the right feels it doesn't matter how obviously untrue it is. Those of us who see the lies can point out that the lying liars have lied again, but that's boring, it happens every day. So any backlash is minimal.
But as you say, it also works on the masses who just aren't thinking critically, and given the sheer volume of that flood of lies, that's a big problem.
It sounds like we're on the same page, I appreciate you clarifying you point for me. Stay safe.
I've watched that video so many times, I don't want to do it again, but I'm pretty sure this is accurate. Grey coat removes the gun from Alex, and as he's walking away there's a muzzle flash and the first shot can be heard. Then the rest of the shots all come a second or so later. The angle from the street where you can see Grey coat run away has the clearest view of it.
Oh and it wasn't an accident. Motherfucker had gun training, he put his finger inside the trigger guard, he intended to discharge that weapon. You don't get an oopsie poopsie for that.
The one video from the other angle (think it's "pink jacket woman") show's the shooter unholstering his weapon as he watches the grey jacket guy take the victim's gun. I don't know where the first shot came from, but that guy straight up executed an unarmed man.
Even the weapon did discharge, that would still be ICE’s fault for pepper spraying and beating the shit out of the guy. Maybe be more careful while you don’t know what on his person.
Given ICE's general level of competence, is it possible the gun accidentally discharged as the agent was carrying it away?
That's what you'd call a negligent discharge, not accidental. The first time I saw the video of the thug taking Alex's gun, I immediately noticed and said, "Why the hell is his finger on the trigger?"
There is a concept taught to anyone handling firearms professionally: you DO NOT put your finger on the trigger until you are ready to fire.
Pretti's pistol is a Sig P230
Which has (allegedly) issues with what appears to be called "uncommanded" discharge
That is, a discharge when being handled otherwise normally, and therefore neither accidental nor negligent.
It is possible, though I would see this as NO EXCUSE, that Pretti's gun discharged and the ice agent fired (wrongly) in reaction to that noise.
Some close analysis of the frame-by-frame appear to clearly show the slide pushed back, while in the same frame seeming to show gray jacket with four fingers around the grip and none inside the trigger guard.
HOWEVER I am not a video expert
This (and every killing which involved an ice/cbp operation) deserved to be thoroughly and impartially investigated
The only possible unintentional discharge is in the diaper in chief