this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
84 points (94.7% liked)

World News

52470 readers
2597 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If the gold isn't in your physical hands then it still has ties to the nation that it's stored in and is subject to its politics.

When people buy gold, they buy certificates of ownership. They don't buy literal hunks of bullion. The gold is still physically in a vault, and a lot of that gold is stored in the US itself. So, what happens if the US says "actually, that gold is ours now"?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but some have transferred the bullion to holdings in the uk and Germany. And those countries have too.

A lot is in the USA, but not all. Holding an asset, even in a failed country (which is highly unlikely, by the way) is still a viable asset.

The fact that you think the USA could claim privately held assets as government property is precisely why some people want to hold gold rather than cash in an account which can be seized digitally.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean "holding" an asset? If they aren't holding it within their borders in their own vaults then it's just paper. The US can just say "that's ours now" and steal it, it's no more a viable asset than the oil being stolen from Venezuela.

Worse, if they pull their gold out too fast it might cause the US to react by locking the vaults anyway.

It's a rock and a hard place. They fucked up by ever trusting the US.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Are you talking about individuals or states at this point? Or varies for each and I agree, outside their borders, for states, it is riskier. However, they are shuffling their hokdings to manage that risk. As are people, which was my point.

I don't think they messed up by trusting the US. It was safe and stable for a prolonged period. They fucked up by not recognizing the risk once trump term 1 started.