this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
79 points (94.4% liked)

World News

53476 readers
2216 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has told Europe it should “keep on dreaming” if it thinks it can defend itself without the support of the United States.

“If anyone thinks here again that the European Union, or Europe as a whole, can defend itself without the US, keep on dreaming. You can’t. We can’t. We need each other,” Rutte said during an address to the European Parliament in Brussels on Monday.

The NATO chief warned European nations they would need to increase defense spending to 10% if they “really want to do it alone,” adding they would need to build up their own nuclear capability, costing billions of euros.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now do the US since they're likely going to be the ones at the front of the attack on the EU.

That's the point he's making. Just subtly. As not to disturb the very thin skin of the US leader in charge of the world's largest active military with bases across the world.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If the US wants to invade Europe it can, there is no point in trying to outspend them.

However they struggled to occupy Afghanistan that spends a fraction of the money the US does, I think they'd have trouble holding Europe.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Though to be fair we have a tad less caves and shitty geography to resist the Afghan way.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Afghanistan and Iraq both had governments the US effectively destroyed and replaced with something worse. They then occupied each of those territories for decades.

Neither had infrastructure, roads, or active US military bases that the EU has. Neither are conveniently located near bodies of water where the US has 7 of the 10 aircraft carriers that exist on the planet. Neither were convenient to invade and dispose the government of, but the US is literally batting 1000 on doing that to whatever nation it wants no matter how remote and inhospitable its terrain.

That's what you should be taking away from Afghanistan. Not that the US occupied it, that they easily fucked it up for generations. Something they're now doing domestically, and loudly announcing they want to export.