this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42467 readers
229 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

so it does that job

It does, really poorly, for the reasons I've listed, and for the reasons in the OP.

With the issue in the article you dont even need to intercept sms meant for a particular user to get access to random users’ accounts, thus totally different issue.

Not a different issue at all. Exact same issue, with lower risk.

I asked, what is better for a second factor than SMS?

I answered this like 12 comments ago.

We're going around in circles now so I'll bid you good night.