this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
272 points (95.0% liked)
Asklemmy
52362 readers
502 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're running interference for a fascist for not using the state as much as he could have? He was a Nazi collaborator.
He sided with the Nazis in World War II and participated in the Holocaust.
You're again running interference for someone that sided with Hitler and participated in the holocaust.
Again, trying to minimize Holocaust participation.
Horthy never once needed to side with the Nazis, nor participate in the Holocaust.
I don't insist that, actually. Color revolution typically has some progressive or faux-progressive elements that get steered by fascists.
An anti-communist that wanted to weaken the socialist system, a-la Kronstadt. He was expelled for undermining socialism, not for "trying to relax brutality." Rather than helping Hungary, coalition parties would have likely undermined and destroyed the socialist framework given the intense presence of fascists.
So a former-Nazi that had a change of heart, but then went the Kronstadt-way similar to Nagy. Willing to destroy socialism.
Same as the prior 2.
Same as the prior 3.
Same as the prior 4, former member of a right-wing populist party and former anti-semite.
So an outright anti-communist, that the supposed "communists" were willing to work with, simply due to opposing communism. This is why the previous 5 need to be deeply questioned in motive, if they were willing to work with anti-communists to undermine and destroy socialism. This was a member of a right-wing populist party.
Again, another anti-communist.
Another right-wing populist you claim to have "communist beliefs."
Cool, still working with anti-communists.
A member of the Axis that collaborated with Nazi Germany and fought for the Arrow Cross Party.
So an outspoken member of the far-right everyone else was willing to work with.
To the contrary, I see a ton of right-wing populists, and a few supposed "communists" that were more than willing to work with them, as well as some outright fascists.
The Hungarian fascism was home-grown, not planted, but was emboldened by the west. That's my point. The CIA didn't make Hungary fascist, they helped existing fascists. The fact that the fascism was Hungarian and not entirely from the US doesn't make it better fascism.
Aptheker was a communist, and used sources both from communists and the west. You're again equating communists with Nazis to make a point, but you were more than willing to downplay Horthy's fascism and the Nazi-collaboration of Hungary.