this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
188 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29727 readers
2657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

JD Vance has a law degree from Yale. He knows this is unconstitutional. He knows administrative warrants were a central cause of the declaration of independence. He knows all of this.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

That's the thing, though, isn't it?

tRump is stupid and incompetent. He has a loyal base that he has a lot of influence over, and he's corrupt as fuck, but he's no more than a figurehead and a convenient puppet for his handlers.

J.D. Vance might not be as charismatic, doesn't have the loyal base or the unchecked influence, but he's just as corrupt, just as evil, maybe even more so because he's not simply narcissistic and self-interested but actually ideologically committed to the project of fascism and theocracy, and his handlers are the main proponents of technofeudalism.

The most concerning part, however, is that J.D. Vance isn't stupid and incompetent like trump. He's intelligent and calculating, meaning he might be even more effective at being evil and corrupt.

The saving grace is that he might not get elected; especially if maga splits into factions post-trump (the groypers vs tpusa, the evangelicals vs tech oligarchs, musk vs thiel/yarvin, and wherever ellison, huang, nadella, pichai, bezos, cook, and zuckerberg, etc. land, they'll all be ruled by self-interest over ideological convictions).

That's why I'm almost hesitant to hope trump dies in office. That would allow Vance to walk into the position without being elected, which could potentially be so much worse than waiting out the rest of trump's term.