this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
69 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

52408 readers
304 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Considering the amount of tech and self hosting types that live in cities, it seems like it would be popular to have little mesh intranets all over the place, but I'm not aware of any.

I read about NYC Mesh a while back, and I wonder if there are other similar things already in widespread use that I just haven't heard about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

After having tinkered with both, I think I prefer Mesh~~Node~~Core because it tries to reduce chatter and IMO provide a better structure, however Meshtastic is easier to get into as all nodes will act as a repeater too, reducing the amount of setup required to have a functional network. If you're in a medium sized city, there is likely some MeshCore repeaters out there, so you can try it only with only a companion device.

MeshCore seems to have the ability to reach much further away by reducing chatter (64 hops vs 3 hops in Meshtastic)

[โ€“] mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] mp3@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brainfart on my part, I meant to write MeshCore. Corrected my comment.

Its all good. I was looking for something that could work with both :)