this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
48 points (88.7% liked)
Politics
11142 readers
115 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I blame the people who enable the perpetrators. While the US is still a democracy, that includes people who voted for the perpetrators, as well as those who threw away their vote allowing the perpetrators to win.
The blame doesn't stop there, I also blame the DNC's bungled handling of the election, but regardless, I have zero doubt in my mind that there would be fewer government kidnappings under Harris regardless of how shitty the circumstances of her nomination were.
In what way did voting for 3rd party candidates last election stop perpetrators? In what way will voting for third party candidates stop perpetrators in future elections? By all means campaign for them, raise awareness, but if they can't make it past the post your votes are wasted.
Until US moves away from FPTP system, you have to work with the system we've been dealt, while pushing for reform. Just wishing it was different doesn't help anyone but the worst candidates.
Working to stop the perpetrators isn't enabling them. You're getting things completely mixed up.
My state has ranked choice voting btw
That's great. Most don't. Plenty of us remember the hateful dogpiling of privileged bluestaters. Anytime someone begged others to just vote. Not for a specific candidate, but just to vote against the Republicans. Yes It didn't matter if you voted because your state was already going that way. But that wasn't the case for most other states.
Or when others begged people to vote strategically for candidates that stood a chance of beating the Republicans. Yes, it didn't matter if you did or didn't because your state was already going that way. Good for you. That wasn't the case for most people. The fact that so many loud obnoxious oblivious blue-staters managed to convince Palestinians in swing states to vote for Trump. Chefs kiss, hilarious. With allies like that who needs enemies.
People voting third party in states without ranked choice voting are arguably even more impactful 🔥
Agreed! They helped elect Trump - look at the impact he's had! They should be proud!
RFK Jr dropped out so he couldn't really have any voters, and Democrats and Republicans aren't third parties. Not sure who you're thinking of. I was talking about people like Jill Stein who tried to stop anyone genocidal from getting elected
Oh yes, Jill Stein! The people's President! I had totally forgotten about Jill Stein, the candidate who is totally not propped up by Republicans to siphon away Democratic votes in swing states.
I've been living under a rock for the last year - how's her administration been going? Has she ended all the wars and state sanctioned kidnappings?
Thank God so many people voted for her, can you imagine if anyone else had won? Good those votes weren't wasted on someone with a statistically significant chance of winning.
Sure, they prop her up by arresting her at protests
Absolutely, Republicans love it.