this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
203 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27307 readers
2431 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I disagree. It really disproves the myth that they're going after criminals only, that there isn't racial profiling going on, or that they're going off of targeted lists. Basically, it's so bad it can be used to reduce support for ICE, and we need that right now.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess my point is that it may change minds and perspectives of ICE. I don't disagree. But, that doesn't change the outcomes. And I don't see it as being effective at doing that. Not anymore that the news coverage of Sandy Hook did for gun control.

The school shootings changed the views of many people in this country on gun control. But changing minds is not my end goal; and it shouldn't be others goal either. Changing minds is meaningless if there is no systemic change. We can all believe that climate change is caused by humans burning fossil fuels and that it will destroy our world as we know it. But if nothing is done to prevent it the prominence of that idea is meaningless. Numbing to a degree in that "every government knows it's a problem. Surely something will be done"

I think the American society is sick. We accept our children being gunned down. We accept our government funding and defending a genocide in Gaza. We accept that our politicians and the wealthy were all friends with a pedophile that invited them to rape children. We will accept ICE being Nazis.

We have been entirely conditioned to accept everything until it reaches our doors personally. I guess I should replace "we accept our children" with "we accept others children" in that last paragraph. Because that's truly how selfish our society is. There is no "we" in America.

I don't know what it will take for Americans to stop going to work and destroy this entire system. I really don't. I think our society is is one of the most unhealthy in human history. To the degree that viewing coverage of violent actions of our government becomes numbing. It has been a way for those upset to feel as though they are doing something simply by knowing about it.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Changing minds is meaningless if there is no systemic change.

Sure, but systemic change is that much harder to achieve if nobody wants that change

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the article is about racial profiling. These off duty cops aren’t white.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah? Re-read my comment. I said it helps disprove the myth that they aren't.