this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
712 points (99.3% liked)

World News

52236 readers
2362 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Toyota, Progressive Insurance, and a data analytics firm are now being accused of collecting detailed personal driving information without proper consent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The only way to truly avoid that outcome is with enforceable rules around consent, transparency, and control, letting drivers see exactly what’s being collected, who it’s going to, and giving them a real way to say no. That, or skip the connected car entirely and drive something that isn’t quietly reporting back every time you hit the brakes.

Yeah none of that's gonna happen anytime soon. When my 16 year old car bites the dust my next car will be another one from that same era. I'm not letting big brother know everything about me and jack up my insurance rates for the privilege of being spied on.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amen. We all drive cars older than 2015, and I've gone against anything newer.

The other issue is all those Flock cameras all over our state and surrounding areas, is almost impossible to not be tracked. I didn't consent to those being used by or municipal or city.

I'm sick of being data points on a spreadsheet!!

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so happy my city took down our flock cameras

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How'd they do it? Contract ended or petition?

Neither. The city shut them down in direct response to it coming into the open that they shared data with federal border patrol, claiming a contract violation.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leave your mobile phone at home as it knows when you're driving, speed, acceleration, routes, times. Then you have the CCTV on the roads tracking your every move with your licence plate and facial recognition.

And when you get home turn off the smart TV, smart fridge, smart dishwasher, doorbell cameras, Alexa's, Google's. These devices aren't for our convenience primarily; they're built to collect our valuable data about our living habits.

Digitally connected electricity, gas and water meters all monitor our usage thus working out our lifestyle patterns and habits. Even smart lightbulbs have the capacity to snoop on our private lives.

From the moment we wake up to turning off the light these connected devices quietly gather data about us innocuously... even when we sleep (phones monitoring breathing sounds).

You can get "smart" devices that do not sell your data, but they are less common and they can be hard to find when shopping. You may not get a choice about "smart" meters, but you may be able to obfuscate your electrical usage with batteries. However, if the batteries have an internet connection they'll probably sell your data.

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I totally get that sentiment, but there have been significant safety improvements in the last 20 years. Your chances of escaping serious injury in an accident are a lot better with a 2025 car than a 2005.

I have a 2024 and I don't like that it's probably sharing data, but I specifically didn't get an older used car because they're much less safe. I pay $90 for full coverage for two drivers in Denver without the telematics app discount.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Older cars would be perfectly safe if newer cars weren't gigantic land battleships.

Lol, I've seen this stupid take so many times here. You should educate yourself on car safety. There have been a lot of important safety innovations over the past 20 years and cars get safer every year. I'm significantly safer in my newer smaller-than-average car than I would be in the same model from 20 years ago.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you threatening higher insurance rates for someone who wants to drive an older car, in the name of safety?

Sounds like insurance companies punish drivers who can't afford/don't want new cars with higher rates, while using safety as a scapegoat.

You completely missed the point of my comment.

The person I replied to was worried that data shared by newer cars would be used to raise their insurance rate, so I mentioned insurance to say it didn't happen to me and my rate is actually pretty low for my area.

Hey, you do you. If you value your privacy over your physical safety then drive an old beater death trap.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Being poor is very expensive.