GenZedong

5186 readers

64 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

Elara@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml

How The Chinese "Do nothing. Win." Foreign Policy Actually Works (youtu.be)

submitted 3 months ago by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We see from the failures of the USSR's socialist state-building attempts after WW2 that unless the people of a country fought and built their socialist system themselves, they will be more susceptible to counter-revolutionary ideas that things could be done some "nebulous better way".

This is a big reason why you see so many Eastern European dumbasses who think that everything wrong with their lives is due to the Soviet Union, forgetting that they were all shithole countries before the Soviet Union built them up.

Research shows that people put more pride and value in something they build themselves, termed the IKEA effect. The same seems true of governance systems.

[–] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah, and that is also why recent Chinese history is a huge part of the education system from a very young age.

[+] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Depends on how small the Eastern European countries you're referring to are.

I personally believe that any country with a population under 80 million people is essentially irrelevant in global politics barring specific circumstances, and should probably merge with its neighbors to get more leverage for development.

I've written earlier that:

Countries <80 million have markets that are too miniscule to be good bargaining chips when negotiating with capitalist companies, unfortunately eliminating the option of pressuring foreign companies into technology transfer agreements ala China. This hurts their industrial and technological growth, placing them at the mercy of larger countries' tech.

Countries that small also do not have enough workforce and internal market to foster vibrant, holistic domestic industry on their own. There simply is not enough money or workforce to cultivate the funds necessary to conduct advanced R&D to continuously keep up with the world in all aspects of industry. Oftentimes, this forces small countries to import most of their manufactured goods.

Lastly, countries that small also do not have enough money or workforce to build up militaries strong enough to go toe to toe against 100+ million population countries. While they may be strong enough to defend the country itself, they are not able to be expeditionary and act on geopolitical objectives abroad. If under threat, small countries ultimately have to seek protection from allied larger countries, again jeopardising sovereignty.

For these reasons, it is imperative for small countries to form unions to get to ~100 million population. At that size, they have the weight to push for industrial development and geopolitical interests.

Some countries are already doing this. Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso have formed the Alliance of Sahel States, with a total population of 71 million, for the express purpose of establishing a common market, industrialization, military cooperation, and eventually unifying into a single sovereign state.

Of course, merging into larger states is unlikely to happen under bourgeois control because national bourgeoisies like to enjoy the minor insignificant spoil of leading a tiny country rather than joining up for the greater good. Also, Western capitalist powers enjoy the ease of pushing around these tiny countries, which might become harder to push around if they merged into larger collectives.