The comprador regime is going to sell off Taiwan piece by piece. First TSMC, now the EEZ, and soon there will be nothing left except the Taiwanese people to sell to the US as anti-China cannon fodder.
Comprehensive49
This is the most roundabout way for the government to have a say in AI company shareholder decisions. Bernie could instead advocate for Chinese-style golden shares which give the government the ability to veto key corporate decisions while not threatening the existing profit and share distribution.
The moat prominent founder of the DSA, Michael Harrington, literally founded it to be the "left wing of the possible within the Democratic Party", while rejecting the actually existing systems of the Soviet Union, China and the Eastern Bloc.
Read this: https://cosmonautmag.com/2019/04/michael-harrington-and-his-afterlives/
At best, they think that socially reactionary messaging will attract rednecks to socialism. This is sorely misguided. People are taught to blame gays, trans, blacks, etc. for their woes instead of capitalists (e.g. somehow trans people are stealing Medicare by continuously wasting money on gender transitioning back and forth every other day).
If we instead focus on addressing their monetary woes directly, people will soon forget about why they even gave a shit about hating minorities and different genders. HasanAbi has talked about this, on how the left needs to ignore conservatives' anti-trans noise and just focus on how they can help economically.
Conceding these points to conservatives, or even agreeing to make them a primary point of debate on campaign, is akin to agreeing with their choice of battlefield and is basically an admission of defeat.
I don't understand why dividing on this line is worth so much political attention. A socialist society has much more important things to debate than the 5 trans atheletes in the world. Let people's personal lives be whatever, why waste energy condemning random categories of human gender and sexual expression.
All categories, including gender, are social constructs, so there will always be outliers. To force these outliers into our artificial boxes is a stupid waste of time.
Why should China pay NVIDIA when that money could instead fund domestic competitors like Huawei, whose GPUs are now becoming competitive?
Thanks!
Somehow, even when American Muslims get hurt, we must worry about how it makes the Zionist Jews feel unsafe. Are we going to address the Islamophobic propaganda that is motivating these hate crimes? Nah.
This is a great overview of poverty alleviation! What's the source for the video?
I agree that imperialism and fascism are twins. Imperialism (sometimes alongside settler colonialism) is applied to subordinate countries, while fascism is applied within.
I would argue that fascism is a method, when the bourgeoisie decides that the appearance of bourgeois democracy is unnecessary and decides to retrench into a mask-off bourgeois dictatorship. However, different cases of fascism can have different symptoms based on the exact response of the capitalists, because fascism does not have hard beliefs other than ensuring capitalist domination. In Nazi Germany, they decided to redirect all anger toward killing minorities as well as leftists. In Spain and Chile, they didn't bother killing that many minorities, they just focused on killing leftists. Fascism behaved slightly differently in Indonesia, where they focused on killing all leftists and also anyone who was Chinese.
When the bourgeoisie deals with an imperially colonized country, often they do not bother with the appearance of bourgeois democracy. They just do bourgeois dictatorship from the beginning, which is how imperialism and fascism are siblings.
Ultimately, I think our disagreement is simply one of word usage. If you want, we can divide between "Imperial Core Fascism" versus "Periphery Fascism" (if you know better terminology from your reading, I'd love to learn). It's just that from what I see in common US usage, fascism is only used to refer to when capitalists do it to their own countries. The US education system never says that US capitalists massacring protestors in banana republics proves the USA is fascist, even though the USA doing so within itself would immediately be termed fascism.
I think we disagree on the breadth of the application of the term fascism in this instance. I am referring to fascism mostly within the Western imperial countries, where it is used as a distraction to reinforce existing capitalism (Germany, Italy, Spain, also Pinochet's Chile).
I don't really think settler colonialism of the Global South should be included under the definition of fascism, at least when taught to American students. Otherwise, things become very messy and too broad, as we are now including a process which brings capitalism to areas that were never under capitalism before. Why can't we just use the term 'settler colonialism' for that?
Great work, I can help review. Can't wait to see the final product!