159
Ubisoft asking all staff to return to office full-time to "boost the collective performance for AAA"
(www.gamesindustry.biz)
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
159 points (97.6% liked)
Games
22911 readers
107 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don’t understand that practice, is it a consolation prize for having to fire people? A reward for not getting laid off?
Investors have very big brains and are never wrong, so when a company drops staff they say it's good to see the company losing dead weight.
Us stupid small-brained normies see a company struggling to have an original idea shaving staff to stay afloat and say "that doesn't look good".
Then the big-brain investor loses money and posts on social media about how you can't win them all. The joke is that us normies also lost money; the investor didnt lose their money, they lost yours, because they were managing your pension fund.
It's a reward for slashing payroll costs and it's only paid to the C suite usually.
Bonus are based on how much profit your division has made. By firing people you lower expenses which increases the profit percentage even though the income in the same.
Except firing the people that actually generate profit is short-sighted and stupid. Firing a few useless c-suite nob-ends makes much more sense.
Then again, who in their right mind would want to work for ubisoft these days anyway?
Short-sighted is fine. They will just move to another company and do it again.
But manglement doesn't want to make sense. They just want to show they are furthering the companies goal.