this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
243 points (99.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

66392 readers
342 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This makes Anna's archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.

[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well no, but in the same spirit of how you don't own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure what you're buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published

[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.