this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
15 points (89.5% liked)

Australia

4879 readers
168 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The director-general and minister do not need to observe procedural fairness in either providing advice or listing a hate group, meaning affected parties will not have the right to dispute allegations against them before they are listed as a hate group.

Don't have to consider procedural fairness?? So groups the Home Affairs Minister and Director General don't like can be freely listed and defamed with no recourse. Theres a reason defamation payouts can get so large, but cunts in these two positions can now throw out a listing that is a whisker under terrorist status and its all cool 😎

They also have the powers to,

  • deport or cancel the visas of individuals associated with hate groups,
  • increase penalties for hate crime offences, and
  • create new aggravated penalties for hate preachers and leaders who advocate violence.

"The great concern we have about banning organisations is there is no requirement for procedural fairness, known as natural justice." "The executive always has to be subject to checks and balances, including by the courts — not to do so breaches the rule of law and is fundamentally undemocratic." - Barrister Greg Barns

What the fuck are they doing. Laws like these can be used by capricious bad actors in the future. This smacks of the US Patriot Act level of democratic undermining.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Has the Australian branch of the BDS movement announced that it is disbanding yet?

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hadn't looked it up before.

https://bdsaustralia.net.au/

From About Us page,

BDS is a peaceful and non-violent means to pressure the State of Israel to end the illegal occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the blockade of Gaza; to allow the internationally recognized Right of Return to Palestinian refugees to the land and homes from which Israel forcibly expelled them in 1948; and to ensure equal rights for all Palestinians living in Israel according to international law and human rights conventions.

Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) is a strategy initiated in 2005 by 170 Palestinian civil society organisations calling for boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel’s government and those entities which support and benefit from its actions in relation to Palestinians, until such time as the Israeli government abides by international law and Palestinians are given the rights and freedoms they are entitled to. It is based on the successful South African anti-apartheid boycott movement of the 1970s and 80s.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, why would they? The new laws are about race, not national politics.