this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10900 readers
1062 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Public servants with Global Affairs Canada (GAC) who have been teleworking full-time for the past several years from cities such as Montreal are now being required to work in offices in the National Capital Region.

The workers were hired before or during the COVID-19 pandemic to work remotely, and some say they’re being forced to resign because they can't relocate.

"I’m angry," said one employee in French whose identity Radio-Canada agreed to protect because they fear reprisal from the employer.

Like others who spoke to Radio-Canada, the public servant said their family and personal circumstances make it difficult for them to move to the Ottawa-Gatineau region, nor can they commute there three or more times a week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca -3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This is for strategic security. Remote work all depends on US tech and is a liability. Pulling global affairs to in office is a matter of national security. Get with the program.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

We have the tech for encrypted communications, and the infrastructure is the same what you have communications with someone across the country or the cubicle over.

It all goes through SSC anyways.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I would have guess "big oil" for 300.

That being said I don't see why anyone would be opposed to other people having the option to work remotely, as it does not take away from your option to choose to work in a office environment five days a week if it's more enjoyable to you. Other people in the office are not "decorative" or considered "furniture".

Some benefits for people that prefer to work "in office" if other are allowed to work remotely (that I can think of from the top of my head).

  • less people on the morning commute meaning a quicker and more enjoyable trip into work.
  • less distraction when trying to concentrate.
  • less chance to catch a cold or virus.
  • cleaner facilities from less use, and less wear and tear of office equipment.

And I say this as someone that goes into a office environment three days a week (because I enjoy "getting out" and it's closer to a bar I like), but I do miss the times when the morning commute was a 20 min drive as opposed to a 40-50 min commute.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 hours ago

I am talking about national security and continuity of government in preparation for a possible war.

You are talking about your personal convenience and your favourite bar.

If you work for global affairs, I hope you quit.