this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

768 readers
374 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 40 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure there was a point in history when betting against the Roman Empire was a solid investment idk I'm not a historian

[–] ourtimewillcome@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

which one?

the unified roman empire lasted till 395 AD, the western either till 476 or 480, depending on your views regarding iulius nepos and the eastern till 1453.

later on, several powers claimed to be the successors of either the western or eastern ones including, but not limited to, the carolingians (800-887) and the hre (962-1806) in the west and the russians (1453 to 1917) and ottomans (1453 to 1922) in the east.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

depending on your views regarding iulius nepos and the eastern till 1453.

If you don't count all the times it fell apart before coming back as an end, there wasn't much of Eastern Rome left when the crusaders took the Latin empire and Nicaea (just saying it's a continuation doesn't mean it is imo)

[–] ourtimewillcome@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago

i mean, this is pretty much true for the west as well. towards the end, the western emperors wielded negligible controll over their de jure posessions and odoacers coup brought little qualitative change for the population, regnum italiae or not. and charlemagne three centuries later and his successors were essentially just larping, lets be honest.

besides, all this continuation and succession nonsense was really just propaganda and intellectual masturbation by the various ruling classes trying to justify their rule.

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

which one?

the 31.december 406

[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Sounds like there were actually a few good times to buy shorts then stonks-up