this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
220 points (98.7% liked)

World News

52127 readers
4792 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Scientists have been forced to rethink the intelligence of cattle after an Austrian cow named Veronika displayed an impressive – and until now undocumented – knack for tool use.

Witgar Wiegele, an organic farmer and baker from a small town in Carinthia near the Italian border, keeps Veronika as a pet and noticed that she occasionally played with sticks and used them to scratch her body.

Word soon got around and before long a video clip of the cow’s behaviour reached biologists in Vienna who specialise in animal intelligence. They immediately grasped the importance of the footage. “It was a cow using an actual tool,” said Dr Antonio Osuna Mascaró at the city’s University of Veterinary Medicine. “We got everything ready and jumped in the car to visit.”

Veronika is far from making even misshapen tools, but her prowess in using them has impressed nonetheless. Over seven sessions of 10 trials, the researchers witnessed 76 instances of tool use as she grabbed the broom to scratch otherwise unreachable regions. Using both ends of the brush counts as multi-purpose tool use, the scientists say, which is extraordinarily rare. Beyond humans, it has only been shown convincingly in chimpanzees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Any other case where you cause unnecessary harm to someone while "respecting" them? And if so, then what's that respect worth?

[–] RalfWausE@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

War.

You can absolutely respect an enemy while throwing all sorts of horrible stuff at them...

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

In that case you are either on the defending side, in which case the harm is not unnecessary or you are on the attacking side, which I can see no respect in.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Lacking photosynthesis, we have to kill to eat. The fact that plants don't have faces and lack any common means of communication with us does not make them any less evolved than any other creature.

It is easy to think of them as inert objects that lack any sense of the world around them, but we already know that not to be the case. I think that understanding that makes it impossible to distinguish killing a plant or an animal. The best we can do is hold the lives we have to take in high regard by being humane, including to plants, and to avoid waste and frivolous killing.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unnecessary harm means housing hundreds or thousands of animals and birds in massive barns without access to the outside environment. It's no different than having pets, where you care for them, feed them and take them for walks. It doesn't mean you can never kill them for food if needed.

That's what respect means.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's the point, we don't need to kill them for food, which makes it unnecesary harm.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I disagree but to each their own.

[–] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Are the hundreds of millions of people who live without eating animals secretly reptiloid, or how do you make sense of that?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How do you "disagree"? We can disagree with opinions but weather or not humans need to eat animals to be healthy is a fact.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

you don't know what anyone else needs

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I do actually. We need nutrients to survive, all of which can be obtained without hurting animals.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

people need more than nutrients.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I thought lol

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm right. there's nothing more to say

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Being right should be self-evident but you refuse to elaborate. At least other people reading this will have an easy time to decide themselves :)

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 16 hours ago

since i'm right, i agree. it will be easy.