77
China says Australia must accept Taiwan reunification or face ‘no forgiveness’
(www.theaustralian.com.au)
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
77 points (94.3% liked)
World News
52127 readers
3361 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just because you come from a failed state that is trying to max out on all the evil stats doesn't mean that's the bar for ethnic nationalism.
Decentre yourself a bit, you yank, and stop thinking about everything through either a US-centric Orientalisation lens.
Proclaiming that Taiwan must be annexed to "build the family across the Strait" "兩岸一家親" and that the only way national rejuvenation can be achieved is through annexation is ethno-nationalist and no different to the "Blood and Soil" concept the Nazis had. I'm hoping you can open your mind a second and realise I'm not talking about the "defence against the US" angle for annexing Taiwan, but specifically the extenisve use of ethnic links and family lingo to justify annexation.
I'm not even saying this as exaggeration, many Chinese are dumbfounded when they travel to Malaysia or Singapore and find that locals despise them for calling them "compatriots". Dude is literally using 同胞, not like comrade, literally co-national.
Man. Talk about dissonance. Which is it? Are we comparing China to white supremacist fascists or are we decentering ourselves and considering the Chinese context for what it is.
The idea that healing from a civil war is ethno-nationalism akin to the Third Reich is completely and utterly ridiculous. The situation with Taiwan is not about nationalism, it's about literally healing the wounds between families that were caught on opposite sides of a civil war. It's about healing from the 40 year white terror on Taiwan committee by Chiang Kai-shek.
So your issue is that the rhetoric is focusing on the shared aspects of the peoples as opposed to focusing on things like violence, dominion, divine right, might makes right, or some other form of justification? Like what are you even saying? You want to ignore the fact that China has legitimate security interests being threatened by the US operating Taiwan as a foreign base but you want to claim that peaceful reunification rhetoric focused on shared aspects of the people reminds you of the Nazi rhetoric that invented a new white race (Aryan) and a whole mystical system of ascendance and ranking that justified their enslavement, genociding, and occupation of the lesser races like the Slavs, Jews, and Romas?
Like, are you serious and just haven't dealt with your cognitive dissonance or are you just being totally disingenuous and don't think anyone can call you on it?
Families that were caught on opposite sides? You mean the ROC soldiers that occupied Taiwan after losing the Civil War? Yeah, there's ample channels currently for that, I don't shed tears for waishengren occupiers sorry.
Point is, you don't have any skin in the game, you're LARP-ing as a revolutionary because you're pissed at the US currently. I get you, sorta. But I ain't buying the "principled anti-imperialist" facade.
Yes, so you clearly don't agree that the KMT had any material claim to being a legitimate government and the Japanese claim was an imperialist one. So undoing both of those leaves us with Taiwan being a province of China and China being under the governance of the CPC and the protection of the PLA. I am glad we agree.
You're in England. You live in the old heart of the empire. You're with the very people who subjugated China with gun boat diplomacy and spent the last 300 years, at least, producing anti-Chinese propaganda. I know you want to claim some form of supremacy that allows you to dismiss valid critique as revolutionary LARPing, but that's not actually addressing anything other than your inability to formulate meaningful responses.
No it fucking doesn't. The PRC's sole claim to Taiwan hinges on the civil war framework and the succession of states, which only works if the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan (shocker: they don't, Taiwan and Pescadores were put under ROC administrative control only after Japan surrendered).
I love how confidently wrong you are about most things you discuss here, including where I'm from and my ethnicity. I find it amusing. Maybe try again, third time it's the charm
Oh you're Romanian, my mistake.
The idea that Japan being defeated and the treaty canceled means Taiwan somehow doesn't revert back to it's 400-year status as a Chinese province is some gymnastics, my friend. It's pretty obvious that's how it works to everyone except Sinophobes and anti-communists. The Sinophobes are funny because they forget the inhabitants of Taiwan are Chinese.
What's also funny is that you people think the ROC, the PRC, and China under the Qing Dynasty are separate countries with separate sovereign claims. There is a single country called China, it organized itself in different ways throughout history. It is internationally recognized as a single country. When the Qing Dynasty ended and China organized under the ROC, it still had to abide by treaties signed by the dynasty because that's how these things work.
You have to discard so much historical precedent and cherry pick and twist so many facts to arrive at your conclusions, it's a wonder you all can keep your whole script straight.
I love the idea that Taiwan isn't China because China wasn't under the same government when it lost it to imperialism. I've seen that from one or two other posters here before . It's some prime propaganda. But no. It doesn't work. You'll have to drop it from your strategy eventually.